RELATIONSHIP OF
DEGREE OF LONGTERM HEARING LOSS
TO PSYCHOSOCIAL IMPACT AND EDUCATIONAL NEEDS
|
Degree of Hearing Loss Based on modified pure tone average (500-4000 HZ) |
Possible Effect of Hearing Loss on the Understanding
of Language & Speech |
Possible Psychosocial
Impact of Hearing Loss |
Potential Educational Needs and Programs |
|
|||
|
Normal Hearing -10 - +15 dB HL |
Children have better hearing sensitivity than the
accepted normal range for adults. A
child with hearing sensitivity in the –10 to +15 dB range will detect the
complete speech signal even at soft conversation levels. However, good hearing does not guarantee
good ability to discriminate speech in the presence of background noise. |
|
|
|
|||
Minimal(Borderline) 16-25 dB HL |
May have difficulty hearing faint or distant
speech. At 15dB student can miss up
to 10% of speech signal when teacher is at a distance greater than 3 feet and
when the classroom is noisy, especially in the elementary grades when verbal
instruction predominates. |
May be unaware of subtle conversational cues which
could cause child to be viewed as inappropriate or awkward. May miss portions of fast-paced peer
interactions which could begin to have an impact on socialization and self
concept. May have immature
behavior. Child may be more fatigued
than classmates due to listening effort needed. |
May benefit from mild gain/low MPO hearing aid or
personal FM system dependent on loss configuration. Would benefit from Soundfield amplification if classroom is
noisy and/or reverberant. Favorable
seating . May need attention to
vocabulary or speech, especially with recurrent otitis media history. Appropriate medical management necessary
conductive losses. Teacher requires
in-service on impact of hearing loss on language development and learning. |
|
|||
Mild26-40 dB HL |
At 30 dB can miss 25-40% of speech signal. The degree of difficulty experienced in
school will depend upon the noise level in classroom, distance from teacher
and the configuration of the hearing loss.
Without amplification the child with 35-49 dB loss may miss at least
50% of class discussions, especially when voices are faint or speaker is not
in line of vision. Will miss
consonants, especially when a high frequency hearing loss is present. |
Barriers beginning to build with negative impact on
self esteem as child is accused of “hearing when he or she wants to,”
“daydreaming,” or “not paying attention.”
Child begins to lose ability for selective hearing, and has increasing
difficulty suppressing background noise which makes the learning environment
stressful. Child is more fatigues
than classmates due to listening effort needed. |
Will benefit from a hearing aid and use of a
personal FM or Soundfield FM system in the classroom. Needs favorable seating and lighting. Refer to special education for language
evaluation and educational follow-up.
Needs auditory skill building.
May need attention to vocabulary and language development,
articulation or speech-reading and/or special support in reading. May need
help with self esteem. Teacher in-service
required. |
|
|||
Moderate41-55 dB HL |
Understands conversational speech at a distance of
3-5 feet (face to face) only if structure and vocabulary controlled. Without amplification the amount of speech
signal missed can be 50% to 75% with 40 dB loss and 80% with 50 dB loss. Is
likely to have delayed or defective syntax, limited vocabulary, imperfect
speech production and an atonal voice quality. |
Often with this degree of hearing loss,
communication is significantly affected, and socialization with peers with
normal hearing becomes increasingly difficult. With full time use of hearing aids/FM systems child may be
judged as a less competent learner.
There is an increasing impact on self-esteem. |
Refer to special education for language evaluation
and for educational follow-up.
Amplification is essential (hearing aids and FM system). Special education support may be needed,
especially for primary children.
Attention to oral language development, reading and written
language. Auditory skill development
and speech therapy usually needed.
Teacher in-service required. |
|
|||
ModerateTo Severe 56-70 dB HL |
Without amplification, conversation must be very
loud to be understood. A 55 dB loss
can cause child to miss up to 100% of speech information. Will have marked difficulty in school
situations requiring verbal communication in both on-to-on and group
situations. Delayed language, syntax,
reduced speech intelligibility and atonal voice quality likely. |
Full time use of hearing aids/FM systems may
result in child being judged by both peers and adults as a less competent
learner, resulting in poorer self concept, social maturity and contributing
to a sense of rejection. In-service
to address these attitudes may be helpful. |
Full time use of amplification is essential. Will need resource teacher or special
class depending on magnitude of language delay. May require special help in all language skills, language based
academic subjects, vocabulary, grammar, pragmatics as well as reading and
writing. Probably needs assistance to
expand experiential language base.
In-service of mainstream teachers required. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Severe71-90 dB HL |
Without amplification may hear loud voices about
one foot from ear. When amplified
optimally, children with hearing ability of 90 dB or better should be able to
identify environmental sounds and detect all the sounds of speech. If loss is of pre-lingual onset, oral
language and speech may not develop spontaneously or will be severely
delayed. If hearing loss is of recent
onset speech is likely to deteriorate with quality becoming atonal. |
Child may prefer other children with hearing
impairments as friends and playmates.
This may further isolate the child from the mainstream, however, these
peer relationships may foster improved self concept and a sense of cultural
identity. |
May need full-time special aural/oral program for
with emphasis on all auditory language skills, speech-reading, concept
development and speech. As loss
approaches 80-90 dB, may benefit from a Total Communication approach, especially
in the early language learning years.
Individual hearing aid/personal FM system essential. Need to monitor effectiveness of
communication modality. Participation in regular classes as much as
beneficial to student. In-service of
mainstream teachers essential. |
|
|||
Profound91 dB HL or more |
Aware of vibrations more than tonal pattern. Many rely on vision rather than hearing as
primary avenue for communication and learning. Detection of speech sounds dependent upon loss configuration
and use of amplification. Speech and
language will not develop spontaneously and is like to deteriorate rapidly if
hearing loss is of recent onset. |
Depending on auditory/oral competence, peer use
sign language, parental attitude, etc., child may or may not increasingly prefer
association with the deaf culture. |
May need special program for def children with
emphasis on all language skills and academic areas. Program needs specialized supervision and comprehensive support
services. Early use of amplification
likely to help if part of an intensive training program. May be cochlear implant or vibrotactile
aid candidate. Requires continual
appraisal of needs in regard to communication and learning mode. Part-time in regular classes as much as
beneficial to student. |
|
|||
Profound91 dB HL or more |
Aware of vibrations more than tonal pattern. Many rely on vision rather than hearing as
primary avenue for communication and learning. Detection of speech sounds dependent upon loss configuration
and use of amplification. Speech and language
will not develop spontaneously and is like to deteriorate rapidly if hearing
loss is of recent onset. |
Depending on auditory/oral competence, peer use
sign language, parental attitude, etc., child may or may not increasingly
prefer association with the deaf culture. |
May need special program for def children with
emphasis on all language skills and academic areas. Program needs specialized supervision and comprehensive support
services. Early use of amplification
likely to help if part of an intensive training program. May be cochlear implant or vibrotactile
aid candidate. Requires continual
appraisal of needs in regard to communication and learning mode. Part-time in regular classes as much as
beneficial to student. |
|
|||
UnilateralOne normal hearing ear and one ear with at least a
permanent mild hearing loss |
May have difficulty hearing faint or distant
speech. Usually has difficulty
localizing sounds and voices.
Unilateral listener will have greater difficulty understanding speech
when environment is noisy and/or reverberant. Difficulty detecting or understanding soft speech from side of
bad ear, especially in a group discussion |
Child may be accused of selective hearing due to
discrepancies in speech understanding in quiet versus noise. Child will be more fatigued in classroom
setting due to greater effort needed to listen. May appear inattentive or frustrated. Behavior problems sometimes evident. |
May benefit from personal FM or Soundfield FM
system in classroom. CROS hearing aid
may be of benefit in quiet settings.
Needs favorable seating and lighting.
Student is at risk for educational difficulties. Educational monitoring warranted with
support services provided as soon as difficulties appear. Teacher in-service is beneficial. |
|
|||
Note: All children
with hearing loss require periodic audiologic evaluation, rigorous monitoring
of amplification and regular monitoring of communication skills. All children with hearing loss (especially
conductive) need appropriate medical attention in conjunction with educational
programming.
References:
Olsen,
W.O., Hawkins, D.B. VanTassell, D.J. (1987). Representatives of the Longterm
Spectrum of Speech. Ear &
Hearing, Supplement 8, pp. 100-108.
Mueller,
H.G. & Killion, M.C. (1990) An easy method for calculating the articulation
index. The Hearing Journal, 42,
9, pp. 14-22.
Hassenstab,
M.S. (1987). Language Learning and Otitus Media, College Hill Press,
Boston, MA.
Developed by:
Karen L. Anderson, Ed.S.
& Noel D. Matkin, Ph.D (1991)